My work here with K is fully emergent,
and though my work at Bella Mente was supposed to be, I was still learning how
to employ the idea and struggled to fully understand it while at the same time
negotiating the needs of the 18 children in our classroom. My curriculum with K
emerges based on her developmental needs and personal interests and I’m finding
that with only one child to focus on, I am gaining the mastery over this method
that I previously lacked. I hardly do any advanced planning these days, except
when it comes to the resource development projects I do during my independent
work time here on the farm. While my project time has greatly increased from my
days at the preschool, I use it in a very different way. I used to think of
planning time by looking ahead, trying to guess at what the kids might take an
interest in to keep us moving forward. Now, I use this time to reflect on what
K is already working on and how I can add more depth to her play in the areas
she shows me she is interested in developing.
Instead of trying to get her interested in the activities I came up with, as I used to, I now let her take the lead
completely and play right along with her, taking mental notes on what materials and activities she likes best and how she prefers to
develop her skills. During my planning time, I reflect on how we spent our time together and develop new resources and ideas for her to further develop the skills she had been working on. The chalkboard table I painted for K a few weeks ago was a
project born out of her desire to draw directly on her nicely finished wood art
table. She showed me her need, to stretch and develop her fine motor skills and
artistry without the limits of just crayon and paper. I found a way to meet
the needs she was communicating through her action without
forbidding her from engaging in a behavior that has both developmental benefits and
brings her great pleasure. She now uses the chalk table every single day and
has since stopped coloring on her other art table, the one she knows she’s not
supposed to draw on. It's a win-win.
When K was struggling with her
desire to pull the tomatillos prematurely from the plant, I brought her over to
the pigeon pea bush where it didn’t matter how many peas she plucked, allowing
her to productively exercise her fine motor skills and her desire to pinch,
pluck, peel, squeeze, manipulate, and eventually eat a green vegetable all on
her own. A week later we revisited the tomatillos and successfully filled a
bucket with only the ripe and ready-to-be-picked fruit. She just wanted
practice manipulating smaller objects and to her it didn’t matter that they
were not ripe, she saw me preventing her from practicing a skill she felt was
important. In this way, K shows me her needs and I make it my job to figure out
the most fun and productive way for her to work on her preferred skills safely
and within our set boundaries.
This is how our curriculum
emerges; we are partners in its creation. K leads the way and I follow with
observations, options and challenges to help her develop the skills that she
has determined, consciously or not, that she is interested in working on. K is
a very sensory-driven learner. The activities that appeal most to her are the
ones that involve manipulating objects with her hands, putting things in her
mouth, testing smells, listening to the sounds around her, and repeating what
she hears. I know this about K because in order to develop our emergent
curriculum, I have to constantly observe and reflect. I watch to see what she
is drawn to, what catches and holds her attention, how she goes about gathering
information, and what methods she most easily uses to successfully solve
problems. I notice this about K not just because of my background in
personality studies, but because following an emergent curriculum requires me
to do so, though understanding the functions of personality according
Myers-Briggs makes my job markedly
easier.
Click here for the source of this chart and check out The Myers Brigg Foundation to learn more |
If I was pre-planning activities
and materials for K, deciding without her what she should learn, then teaching
it to her, I would spend so much time talking that I would likely never pick up
on all of the nuances of her personality and learning style. We would both likely
end up significantly more frustrated and with a far more strained relationship,
devoid of much of the fun we have together. Clearly lecture style education is not appropriate for a nearly two year old, but K is a hands-on experience driven learner, lecture is never going to be the most successful way to hold her attention or interest, regardless of age. Through our play together, K expertly guides me toward a curriculum that meets her needs, and keeps
her both happy and engaged. She is constantly learning and developing her skills at
an optimal pace, making sure she gets the very most out of every experience. If
she is capable of doing this before she is even two years old, why would this
capacity diminish as she hits elementary school, middle school, high school and
beyond?
Kohn's a critical voice in education reform |
America’s public education system
does not view children as capable or responsible enough to play an active role
in what and how they learn. Rather, they are viewed as empty vessels waiting
for adults to pour in whatever information they see fit. This model has little regard
for students’ interests, personalities, and learning styles, let alone the
problems that are most relevant in their communities. We know that all children
are unique, we tell them all the time in an attempt to raise self-esteem, yet
we contradict ourselves by forcing them to conform to a model of learning that
was designed to produce obedient, faceless factory workers who all think and
act alike. Sure, this form of standardized education makes it easier to test
and rate our children but that doesn’t mean it measures the most important
things. I was a terrible test taker; judged by my scores alone you would never
know the extent of my skills, knowledge, motivation and love of learning. All
standardization has done for our students (and thus our society as a whole) is
to teach kids that school is boring and irrelevant, while at the same time making
skilled teachers hate their jobs and burn out at alarming rates. How is this
helpful?
I have often heard worried and
skeptical parents wonder “given the choice, wouldn’t most students pick nothing
but recess and snack?” I’ve worked with plenty of “difficult” kids who spend
their free time reading books, tending a garden, or memorizing the names and favorite
foods of every dinosaur that ever existed. These kids do this because all human
beings have an innate desire to learn. So what quashes this quality that helped
human beings evolve from apes into who we are today? There are likely many
reasons for this but I’m willing to bet that students’ lack of a voice in the
process of learning is at or near the top of the list. Students often stop or
ignore the pursuit of their natural interests because our current model of
education forces them to. Some students give up and suffer through school only
to get out and have no idea what they are good at or even interested in. Other
times students give up on school entirely, believing it irrelevant and pursue
their interests anyway, but without the diplomas they usually end up just as
disadvantaged.
I love the Reggio Approach
because rather than a “teaching to” style of education, it embraces the ideas
of “learning with,” which to me makes so much more sense. An emergent
curriculum, which is essentially the precursor of the self-directed study
detailed in The Independent Project, invites students to play and active rather
than passive role in their education so they develop an inborn love of
learning. If students are able to continue in this way, they will never reach
the point of mental exhaustion and boredom that leads to recess being the only
time they get to have fun at school. Following most current public school
curricula, recess is one of the few times during the day when students have
complete control over how they spend their time. Instead of seeing their
learning as fun, it becomes something they need to escape from. In this
approach, recess is the reward for suffering through something that is not
enjoyable, perpetuating the myth that learning is in opposition to fun.
K worked at it all week and can now lift herself up on the swing! |
In an emergent curriculum, play is acknowledged not only as a necessary component of
learning, but the primary means for understanding the world. Interest is what
motivates human beings to keep learning and honing our skills. Whether it’s
Einstein playing with the ideas of physics to postulate the Theory of
Relativity, or Gillian Lynne playing with the movements of her body that led to
the choreography of the Broadway classic Cats, play is a crucial part of the process. When I am with K,
I let her show me how she likes to play and from there we build our curriculum
together. Right now she is most interested in learning to master her physical
skills so we spend our time together climbing, swinging, jumping, stretching,
and manipulating all kinds of materials in all kinds of new ways. After she has
worked her body as much as it can handle, she tells me so and we shift gears. K
is also interested in expanding her vocabulary and learning the power of her
own voice so we read, sing, talk, rhyme, count, shout and write together. At
some point each day K gets hungry and asks me for some blueberries, her current
favorite, so we stop for a snack before heading back out for more play. Through
our emergent curriculum, K is challenging herself every day and surprising both
of us with her rapidly increasing capability.
If a student as young and fiercely
independent as K is already capable self-directed study, it seems crazy to me
that post-preschool students not be afforded the same right to have a say in
what and how they learn. After all, aren’t we each an expert when it comes to
ourselves? No one knows better than I do that I learn best when information
comes in the form of a story. Though I struggled through and never enjoyed math
and science in school, I have picked up countless biology and agriculture
lessons from the farm narratives I love to read, and I got my only A in a math
class when my high school geometry teacher started each lesson with the story
of the philosopher who postulated the theory in question. When framed in a
compelling narrative, I could learn almost anything and do so willingly all the
time. But K prefers to experience things first-hand, trusting her own senses to
teach her about how the world works, her imagination is not the effective
learning tool that it always has been for me. We see and interact with the
world differently.
An emergent curriculum leaves
room for both K and I to learn in the way that is most effective for each of
us, while at the same time allowing us to see the world through one another’s
eyes. This approach to teaching and learning does not require a separate
curriculum for each student, rather it invites all kinds of learners to come
together, share ideas, experiences, questions, and perspectives to create a
more complete understanding of each topic. In the Independent Project, students
pursued the aspects of a problem or topic that most interested them and studied
it for the week with the goal of sharing what they learned in a way that would
engage and interest their fellow students. Each student walked away from the
week with a general knowledge of whatever subject was being explored as well as
a deeper understanding of one piece of the puzzle. Isn’t this the very same
outcome most teachers hope for when they design their curriculum? The only
difference is that in a self-directed study, the students do the design work.
This frees teachers to engage and connect with their students, listen to their
ideas and ask thought provoking questions, and offer the individual support
that every teacher wants to provide but simply doesn’t have the time or energy
to give.
More resources like this on my Pinterest page |
I can’t speak for all teachers,
but for me, and many teachers I have worked with, the passion to teach comes
from a love of learning and sharing information with others so that we all can
realize our true potential. An emergent curriculum is equally more enjoyable
for me as it has been for those I have had the privilege of teaching. I have
learned more about math and science and art and literacy from engaging in study
alongside my students than I could have imagined and I loved the learning
process more than I ever did when I was the student being taught at in grade
school. My enthusiasm for learning does not go unnoticed by my students,
either. When they see me so genuinely engaged in how the diet of a chicken
effects the hue and nutritional content of its eggs yolks, that information
gets planted deeper in their memories and leaves them wondering what else might
be effected in a similar way, or even just about cause and effect in general.
The intense passion I model in the process of engaging with them on a subject
that deeply interests me shows them the joy in learning new things and seeking
out knowledge. This desire to learn and the know-how to make it happen are the
most important things I, or any teacher, could possibly hope to pass on to the
next generation and this is the foundation of what I hope to teach K in the
short time I am here with her.
No comments:
Post a Comment